Welcome to a side of renowned astrophysicist and science communicator Neil deGrasse Tyson that you might not be familiar with – his Twitter takedowns of movies and TV shows! While Dr Tyson is best known for his contributions to the field of astrophysics and his engaging science outreach, his social media presence reveals a knack for injecting humor and wit into his critiques of scientific inaccuracies in popular entertainment.
In this blog post, we will explore some of the amusing and insightful Twitter critiques by Neil deGrasse Tyson. Through his playful analysis, he examines the scientific accuracy – or occasional lack thereof – in movies and TV shows. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a cosmic journey through Neil deGrasse Tyson’s hilarious take on the science of the silver screen!
The Original Calculators
In our modern world, it’s clear that smartphones and computers have become indispensable tools for solving everyday math problems. Calculators are no longer necessary when complex calculations are just a few button presses away. With this in mind, Tyson is not currently focused on scrutinizing scientific errors; instead, he aims to highlight the key figures who should be acknowledged for their contributions to astronomical mathematics.
Iconic individuals like Katherine Johnson have rightfully earned lasting recognition, with their incredible stories preserved through cinematic portrayals such as “Hidden Figures.”
Seal of Astronomical Approval
In a world where Neil DeGrasse Tyson is widely recognized for his critiques of space-related content, making a movie titled “The Sun is Also a Star” can be seen as quite audacious. Although the film does not revolve primarily around scientific themes, it’s understandable why Tyson would eagerly apply his rigorous standards to evaluate it.
The movie’s central character, Natasha, who embraces science over fate, would likely be pleased to know that the discerning Tyson has given his endorsement to the film’s scientific aspects.
Count Your Digits
Cartoons have revolutionized television entertainment by proving their appeal to a broad adult audience. Shows like The Simpsons, Futurama, and Family Guy have played a significant role in reshaping the perception of cartoons as exclusively for children. In one intriguing observation, Tyson highlights that all the characters in these shows are missing a digit.
This raises an interesting question: what could this symbolize?
Moon Pirates
Ad Astra, the sci-fi masterpiece starring Brad Pitt, transcended the typical space movie genre by delving deep into the psyche of its characters. It contributed to the ever-growing collection of films depicting men in space suits confronting their emotional struggles in the weightlessness of space. With numerous films dedicated to traditional sea pirates, it begs the question – why not explore the concept of space pirates?
The concept of lunar piracy raises intriguing questions about the practicalities of waging warfare in the cosmos, and Ad Astra certainly provokes more inquiries than it resolves.
Ice Ice Baby
In the intricate process of movie production, there’s a team dedicated to making even the smallest decisions. While creating an animated movie like Disney’s Frozen may not require extensive research like a thought-provoking documentary, the filmmakers still strive for certain elements to be true to life.
If there was a physics expert on the Frozen production team, they must have been delighted upon reading Tyson’s tweet. It’s gratifying that their efforts received recognition.
Lights, Camera, Accuracy
It is significant how Neil DeGrasse Tyson consistently provides insightful analysis of Disney’s Frozen within the realm of animated children’s movies. One might ponder on the number of times he must have watched the film to gather such a wealth of observations.
While the talking inanimate objects and exaggerated eyeballs may have left Tyson somewhat unsettled, it is important to recognize that the movie did succeed in certain aspects.
To the Moon
Most of us regular folks will never get the chance to see Earth from the moon’s perspective unless we happen to be astronauts. That’s why movies about space, like “Ad Astra,” captivate our imagination. They offer extraordinary views that are usually beyond our reach. While we understand that these fictional space adventures may not adhere strictly to NASA’s factual documentaries, we can usually overlook minor inaccuracies.
However, when a film revolves around the moon, one would expect it to explore meticulous lunar research, don’t you think?
Winging It
It’s important for individuals who dedicate themselves to saving the world to have the necessary resources to support their missions. The Batmobile, known for its iconic presence, raises an interesting question that has sparked our curiosity. Imagine the logistical challenge of trying to enjoy a cup of coffee in the Batmobile during a conflict with the Joker.
It’s undeniable that even superheroes need to prioritize staying hydrated during those long nights of dispensing justice.
Supernatural Twins
When it comes to the superhero universe, we often think of Marvel and DC as the main players. However, there are independent characters that don’t fit into either category. Our hero with a puck falls into this unique category.
Tyson brings up an interesting point by pointing out the similarities between these two characters, which naturally leads us to question: If Thanos and the sinister demon were to battle it out, who would come out on top?
Wrong, He Is
Yoda, despite his small size, holds a special place in the world of cinema. He is beloved for his wisdom and power. In “The Mandalorian,” Yoda’s character gained even more popularity when they introduced a smaller version that resembled a baby. This caused some division among Star Wars fans.
However, it’s important to note that this character is not actually Baby Yoda; he goes by the name Grogu. Despite this clarification, many still find Grogu adorable. But if you happen to share Tyson’s perspective, this young Padawan might not have won you over.
Prestigious Award
When filmmakers begin a new project, their main goal is usually to create an exceptional movie that receives praise from both critics and the audience. While some films exceeded expectations, others may not quite hit the mark. In 1998, “Armageddon” achieved a rather unique accomplishment that any filmmaker would likely find interesting. It was awarded the title of ‘Least Scientifically Accurate Film’ by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, a recognition not easily obtained.
Although it didn’t secure Academy Awards, this distinction is certainly noteworthy. Congratulations!
Abra Cadabra
Neil DeGrasse Tyson often tweets about superheroes, expressing a clear preference for a particular superhero universe – one that aligns with popular expectations. He understands that scientific accuracy isn’t the main appeal of superhero stories. So, what is his take on embracing the fantastical and magical elements?
And it seems he has strong opinions on Harry Potter as well.
Troublesome Tribbles
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is known for his expertise in critiquing the scientific accuracy of movies and TV shows. In a surprising turn, he has noticed a remarkable similarity between real-life creatures and the fictional ones from Star Trek called Tribbles.
These iconic creatures were known troublemakers in the series, much like how we observe rabbits reproducing prolifically in reality. It’s intriguing to think that these fluffy creatures may actually be more intimidating in appearance compared to actual rabbits.
Bat to the Bone
Imagine Batman without his iconic Bat Signal, the symbol that prompts him into action. Without it, not much would change, as this famous landmark becomes useless on clear nights in Gotham, as Tyson points out. If the creators were to reinvent the concept and have Batman rely on a simple beeper instead, it wouldn’t be that remarkable.
However, the idea of using an emoji as his signal is truly intriguing and leaves us excited to see this unconventional twist on the Dark Knight’s legendary summoning symbol.
We Come in Peace
The question of extraterrestrial life has intrigued humanity for centuries. Our imagination, often shaped by Hollywood portrayals, tends to envision aliens as the iconic green creatures from movies like Toy Story. However, according to Neil deGrasse Tyson, the renowned astrophysicist, a more fitting image might be that of Thor, the Norse God.
While Thor is not technically an alien but rather a deity from mythology, both gods and extraterrestrials possess an otherworldly allure that captivates our fascination with the unknown. This makes them undeniably fascinating and beautiful in their unique way.
That’s Progress
Rick and Morty is more than just a cartoon; it serves as a profound exploration of the profound void that often accompanies our existence. This animated series places a premium on humor rather than scientific precision, making it an easily digestible, comforting watch. Despite its animated and sometimes zany nature, Rick and Morty has garnered recognition and respect from experts in the scientific and astronomical domains. Surprisingly, these specialists find the show’s scientific content to be even more commendable and engaging than the superhero-laden spectacles offered by Marvel.
In this strange paradox, the series manages to be both a source of laughter and a subject of intellectual appreciation for those who delve into its intricate and often absurd exploration of the cosmos.
Wingardium Leviosa, Neighbor!
Many children across the country grew up with Mister Rogers as their beloved television “Neighbor.” While the movie “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood” wasn’t a documentary, Tom Hanks’s portrayal of Rogers captured the essence of the man who had an enchanting and captivating presence. Before Tyson’s perspective, we had never thought about Mr. Rogers possesses extraordinary powers like telekinesis.
However, Tyson presents a convincing argument that makes us question whether these potentially magical abilities were what made him so charming all those years ago.
Defining Gravity
When filmmakers explore outer space in their movies, scientists are always curious to see how accurately they depict the cosmic expanse. In the case of “Gravity,” Neil deGrasse Tyson’s critique focuses not on the physics but on the film’s choice of title. While Sandra Bullock’s character navigates zero gravity in the movie, Tyson’s point is technically correct.
However, it’s hard to deny that “Gravity” is a more captivating and appealing title for the film, even if it sacrifices scientific precision.
Physics Fail
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is well-known for his meticulous scrutiny of blockbuster films and television series. His latest focus is “Game of Thrones,” where he offers a critique not about the origin of the chains, but rather the precise angle when deployed.
While “Game of Thrones” may not be the typical source for life advice, you can at least be better prepared for your next dragon-rescue mission by knowing the correct way to maneuver those chains for the job.
Bright Spark
“Game of Thrones” held the world’s fascination for a considerable time, despite its controversial ending. Amidst the intricate plotlines, frequent character departures, and power dynamics, it’s safe to say that most viewers weren’t seeking a lesson in thermal physics.
However, Neil DeGrasse Tyson offered valuable insights that shed light on important aspects of the show. For instance, his expertise helped determine which dragon boasted the most formidable fiery breath.
Too Close to Home
The film “Don’t Look Up” has gained attention for its satirical yet eerily realistic portrayal of a world on the brink of destruction from an impending comet, with those in power ignoring the imminent threat. Renowned expert Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s response carries significant weight.
When someone as knowledgeable in science and astronomy as Tyson strongly emphasizes that the movie feels less like a humorous commentary and more like a genuine documentary, it becomes more than just a clever tweet—it serves as a wake-up call to take notice.
Sunshine State
The film “Barbie,” directed by Greta Gerwig in 2023, made a strong impact by exploring the appearance of an idealized world called Barbieland. This film prompted us to consider the possibilities that lie beyond reality and within the enchanting fantasy of a flawlessly pink universe. Neil DeGrasse Tyson, our trusted astrophysics expert, offers intriguing insights suggesting that Barbieland may not be as far away as we think.
His expertise sheds light on important questions that have captured our curiosity. It’s fascinating to discover that experiencing a life like Barbie might be as simple as visiting Florida.
Missile the Point
As we immerse ourselves in the exhilarating high-altitude adventures of “Top Gun: Maverick,” the scientific virtuoso Neil DeGrasse Tyson gracefully interjects with his meticulous and scientifically sound observations, gently grounding us in reality. The audacious flights through a storm of missiles by Maverick and the Top Gun squadron are at the core of their thrilling escapades.
While Neil may overlook our anticipation and enjoyment of these daring maneuvers as an audience, his incisive perspective adds depth to our cinematic experience.
Starry Eyed
Did you find yourself more inclined toward “Armageddon” or “Ad Astra”? These two sci-fi films exhibit numerous distinctions, not the least of which is the two-decade interval separating them. However, one consistent element is the presence of leading lady Liv Tyler. Her recurring role in astronaut-themed romances might suggest more than mere coincidence; it could be a deliberate career preference.
While she may have been cast in similar space-related roles, Neil DeGrasse Tyson appears to hold reservations about this. Playing such roles doesn’t necessarily signify that it’s time for her to depart our planet entirely.
Just Sayin’
As an eminent astronomer, Neil DeGrasse Tyson likely possesses a profound understanding of diverse universes, both real and imaginative. While various colours and forms of Kryptonite exist in the DC Comics lore, Tyson discerns that it’s the green variety alone that wields the potency to incapacitate Superman. Perhaps Tyson’s insights hint at a more profound social commentary, pondering the symbolism of green as the superhero’s ultimate vulnerability.
Is it possible that jealousy or envy, often associated with the colour green, serves as the one element capable of humbling the mighty Superman?
